Skip to main content

Featured

Single Buy vs. Genuine Cluster

Insider buying alerts get treated as a single, uniform signal, but a single purchase and a genuine cluster of independent purchases carry very different informational weight — and the distinction is checkable in public filings well before it becomes a headline. The Surface Issue Stock-screening tools flag "insider buying" whenever any officer or director makes an open-market purchase, with no distinction between a routine, isolated transaction and a genuinely unusual pattern. That flattening is what makes the raw alert an unreliable signal on its own. The Structural Cause Insiders buy shares for reasons that often have nothing to do with a near-term view on the stock — personal financial planning, routine plan participation, diversification timing. A single purchase can't be distinguished from these ordinary reasons. Multiple, independent insiders buying within a short window is much harder to explain away as coincidence or routine planning. 144TICKJOURNAL · TR...

Five Mistakes Traders Make Reading RSI

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is one of the most widely used momentum indicators, and also one of the most commonly misapplied. Each mistake below comes with a concrete, specific correction rather than a general caution.

Mistake One: Treating 70 and 30 as Universal, Fixed Thresholds

The standard convention treats RSI above 70 as "overbought" and below 30 as "oversold," applied identically to every stock. In practice, a strongly trending stock can hold RSI above 70 for extended stretches while continuing to climb, making an automatic sell signal at that threshold a costly, premature exit from a genuine trend. Concrete fix: check the stock's own RSI history over the past 6-12 months — a stock that has repeatedly touched RSI 80+ during strong uptrends without reversing needs a higher personalized threshold (e.g., 80 instead of 70) before treating a reading as genuinely overbought for that specific name.

Mistake Two: Using RSI in Isolation Without Confirming the Broader Trend

RSI overbought/oversold readings behave differently in trending versus range-bound markets. In a strong uptrend, RSI can remain elevated for long stretches as a feature of the trend's strength, not a warning sign. In a range-bound market, the same 70/30 thresholds tend to be more reliable turning-point signals. Concrete fix: check whether the stock is in a defined trend (using a longer moving average, such as the 50-day, as a trend filter) or trading in a range before assigning meaning to an overbought/oversold reading — the same RSI number means different things in each context.

Mistake Three: Missing Divergence, the More Reliable Signal

Many traders watch only the RSI number itself and miss divergence — when price makes a new high but RSI fails to make a corresponding new high (bearish divergence), or price makes a new low while RSI fails to make a new low (bullish divergence). Divergence has historically been considered a more reliable warning of weakening momentum than the raw overbought/oversold level alone. Concrete fix: when price reaches a new high or low, explicitly compare that move against the corresponding RSI peak or trough from the prior swing — a mismatch between the two is the specific pattern worth flagging, not just the RSI's absolute current level.

Mistake Four: Using a Default 14-Period Setting Without Considering the Timeframe

The standard RSI setting uses a 14-period lookback, which was popularized for daily charts. Applying the same 14-period setting without adjustment on very short intraday timeframes can produce a signal that's noisier and less reliable than intended, since 14 five-minute bars represent a much shorter, choppier window than 14 daily bars. Concrete fix: for shorter intraday timeframes, test a longer period setting (such as 21 or 25) to smooth out some of the added noise from the shorter bar interval, rather than assuming the default 14-period setting is universally optimal across every timeframe.

Mistake Five: Trading RSI Signals Without Any Confirmation Trigger

Entering a trade the instant RSI crosses a threshold, without waiting for any additional confirmation, tends to catch a disproportionate number of false signals, since RSI can hover near a threshold and cross it repeatedly during choppy conditions. Concrete fix: require RSI to cross back through the threshold in the opposite direction (e.g., RSI dropping back below 70 after having been above it) as the actual entry trigger, rather than acting the moment it first crosses into overbought or oversold territory.

Summary Table

MistakeConcrete Fix
Fixed 70/30 thresholds for every stockCheck the stock's own RSI history and personalize thresholds
Ignoring trending vs. range-bound contextUse a moving average trend filter before interpreting RSI
Missing divergenceCompare RSI peaks/troughs against corresponding price swings
Default 14-period on every timeframeTest longer periods (21-25) on shorter intraday charts
No confirmation triggerWait for RSI to cross back through the threshold before entering

The Takeaway

RSI is a genuinely useful momentum tool, but its default settings and standard thresholds are starting points, not universal rules. Personalizing thresholds to the specific stock, filtering by trend context, watching for divergence specifically, adjusting the period for the timeframe, and requiring a confirmation trigger together turn a commonly misread indicator into a more reliably applied one.

This post is educational content for traders and not financial advice. RSI is one indicator among many and does not predict future price movement with certainty. Trade with capital you can afford to lose.

Comments